Bias in Journalism

-

Purpose: To criticize Bethesda’s choices as a game studio on the recent publishing of Fallout 76
Diction: Speaks as though the writer is acting as mouthpiece for all gamers and bethesda consumers, speaks for more people than himself
Pathos: References other games and growing trend of companies releasing unfinished games (For example, Elder Scrolls Online, No Man’s Sky)



Bias by Source: Polygon has a long history of making bad reviews of games for the purpose of getting views, that is supposed to provide an objective review of games. This, as well as other games being released, for example Red Dead Redemption 2, that are being received with unanimous praise, the industry needs something negative to talk about, resulting in a perfect storm for FO76

Bias through Word choice: “The unimaginative, chorelike events it foists, unwanted on its players, and a storyline in which it is literally impossible to empathize with any other character because they’re all either dead or brainless, means its makers stopped — only for now, one hopes — well short of what could have been done.” Saying things like “unwanted by its players”, and implying it is seen as a bad move by all is implying NO ONE is enjoying this game, which is not true. Many people say this game is great, and myself included, someone who has actually experienced the game, can vouch for its world diversity and mechanics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gender in advertising

-
Image
These two ads for boys and girls clothing differentiates in that the boy is wearing clothes that promote learning, with an Albert Einstein shirt, and the heading saying ”The little scholar”. Meanwhile the young girl is wearing less academic clothes and the heading reads “The social butterfly.” My perception of gap did not change after this, they have been slammed for similar ad campaigns in the past.  This ad implies that only boys can be scholarly, and that women are not interested in learning, only in being social. I do not think this ad is okay, and this controversy could easily be fixed by just having both of the children’s titles in the ads be scholarly. For example, just call the little’s girls look “the bookworm” or some other nerdy phrase and it wouldn’t have been a problem. I doubt the makers of the ads were purposefully trying to offend people, and whether or not they did it unconsciously is up for debate, but how this ad actually reached people is astounding. No o
Read more

WT1 Reflection

-
My Written Task 1 came out less than perfect, and I wish I had put more effort into it. I had some problems identyifying the arguments and purposes of the texts in relation of one another. My arguments were all very similar, and I kind of jumped around quite a bit during the writing proccess. However, my paper does follow the basic structure of what is expected, it has an introduction and broad analysis of the texts, moving into arguments and then conclusion. My paper also had a good length, slightly above the average of my classmates, but not too long either. I hope to take what I learn from writing this written task and apply to all my future writing endeavours, but as for this paper, it was kind of a flop to be honest.
Read more